Monitoring reports
Due to confidentiality, many uses of Outcome Harvesting cannot be shared. Here are some of the publicly available examples of developmental, formative and summative evaluations that used Outcome Harvesting. They illustrate the potential of the approach to be usefully adapted to a wide variety of monitoring and evaluation needs.
-
End Evaluation of ActionAid’s Africa We Want Project 2017-2021
Kornelia Rassman, Goele Scheers and Patrick Sando
This is a summative Outcome Harvesting Evaluation of ActionAid (AA) Denmark’s project “Mobilizing Civil Society Support for Implementation of the African Governance Architecture”, referred to as the “Africa We Want Project” (AAW). The project aimed to increase and strengthen the role that civil society organisations (CSOs) and youth platforms play in promoting good governance and democracy in Africa. The project had an extensive geographic coverage spreading across eight countries, three regions, and at the pan-African level engaging with the African Union (AU) to promote the operationalization of the African Governance Architecture (AGA) and one of its instruments, the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance (ACDEG).
Outcome Harvesting Evaluation ActionAid Denmark Tax Justice Programme
Goele Scheers
Outcome Harvesting Evaluation of ActionAid Denmarks Tax Justice Programme. The programme focussed on good governance, with two interlinked overall programme objectives: 1. Securing improvement in the quality, equity and gender responsiveness of public services for people living in poverty; 2. Securing fair redistribution of resources through taxation.
-
GPPAC EVALUATION 2006-2011
NATALIA ORTIZ AND RICARDO WILSON-GRAU, 2012
A formative assessment of the 208 outcomes achieved and the performance of the global secretariat and 15 regional affiliates of the Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict.
GPPAC Mid-Term Review 2016-2018
Goele Scheers and Wolfgang Richert (2019)
Outcome Harvesting Mid-term Evaluation of the GPPAC outcomes from 2016-2018.
End-term Evaluation Report
Prevention up Front Alliance 2016 - 2020
Nele Blommestein, Anne van Marwijk & Marjolein Kok (2020)
End evaluation of the Prevention up Front Alliance using Outcome Harvesting. The Alliance brings together GPPAC's network and two networks coordinated by WFM-IGP, namely: Coalition of the International Criminal Court (CICC) and International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect (ICRtoP).
-
OUTCOME “HARVESTING” – EVALUATION OF OXFAM NOVIB´S GLOBAL PROGRAMME 2005-2008
RICARDO WILSON-GRAU, JULIETTE MAJOT, WOLFGANG RICHERT
Summative evaluation of Oxfam Novib’s €22 million program to support 38 grantees working on sustainable livelihoods and social and political participation. Documents over 300 outcomes from 111 countries.
-
Outcome Harvesting Mid-Term Evaluation of NIMD Country Programmes in Colombia, Mali, Mozambique and Tunisia
Goele Scheers & Ricardo Wilson-Grau
Due to sensitive information, only the summary of the report is available.
-
OUTCOME HARVESTING EVALUATION INSPIRED+ PROJECT
Goele Scheers, Richard Smith
Outcome Harvesting was used the evaluate the INSPIRED+ project. This is an EU-funded project that supported local actors in nine different countries in identifying, analysing and monitoring those domestic policies that hinder the full implementation of the UN human rights and ILO labour rights conventions relevant to the EU’s Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+). It was implemented in Armenia, Bolivia, Cabo Verde, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Pakistan, Paraguay, and the Philippines. In each of those countries, EPD together with a local implementing partner (Hosting Structure) and after consulting the EU Delegation, selected one GSP+ related topic that was to be addressed through inclusive and participatory multi-stakeholder dialogue following the INSPIRED method.
-
End Evaluation of ADRA’s Action for Social Change Programme in Malawi
Goele Scheers | Ashton Mandrup | Karen Ansbæk
In cooperation with ADRA Denmark, ADRA Malawi implemented the Action for Social Change (ASC) programme, which ended in 2020 after almost 10 years. The overall objective of the programme was to “empower people living in poverty to participate and contribute to realise their right to sustainable development”.
Outcome Harvesting was used as the evaluation method, focusing on collecting (harvesting) the changes in behaviour of the duty bearers as a result of the advocacy efforts from the communities. The outcomes from the ASC programme were harvested through interviews and focus groups with ADRA Malawi staff and partners and a sample of these outcomes was substantiated with external third partners.
-
EVALUATION OF CARE’S OIKKO (UNITY) PROJECT, PROMOTING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FUNDAMENTAL LABOUR RIGHTS IN THE READY-MADE GARMENT (RMG) SECTOR IN BANGLADESH, 2018
RICHARD SMITH, HUMAIRA AZIZ AND JOE SUTCLIFFE
This summative, internal evaluation used workshops to harvest outcomes from ready-made garment workers, organisers of worker self-help groups and trade union officials. Outcomes identified changes in the ability and willingness of workers to raise issues / claim rights in their workplaces, responses from employers to worker demands, changes in gender relations in communities and households, and improved capacities and willingness of trade unions to represent the concerns of women workers in the ready-made garment sector. Crucially for CARE’s learning, the evaluation examined how the project contributed to the pathways of change evident in the outcomes.
-
EVALUATION OF THE FORD FOUNDATION’S STRENGTHENING HUMAN RIGHTS WORLDWIDE GLOBAL INITIATIVE (SHRW), 2012-2016
BARBARA KLUGMAN, SOUTH AFRICA; RAVINDRAN DANIEL, INDIA; DENISE DORA, BRAZIL; MAÏMOUNA JALLOW, KENYA; MARCELO AZAMBUJA, BRAZIL
The US$54 million initiative funded seven human rights groups from the Global South and seven International NGOs headquartered in the Global North in order to further catalyze efforts underway to strengthen the perceived legitimacy and influence of local movements on global agendas and strategies. Documents 1,250 outcomes influenced by the 13 organisations.
-
Outcome harvesting evaluation: IIEP-UNESCO’s support to the education sector plans in Jordan and Guinea
Anna Haas
With support from Goele Scheers and Conny Hoitink
This document collects, analyses, and evaluates the outcomes of the UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP) support to two national education sector plans (ESPs): Jordan’s 2018−2022 Education Strategic Plan and Guinea’s 2020−2029 Programme Décennal de l’Education en Guinée (ProDEG). This evaluation was an internal pilot exercise for IIEP concerning the use of the outcome harvesting methodology. The evaluation was carried out by Anna Haas with coaching from Goele Scheers and Conny Hoitink.
Évaluation du programme Améliorer l’éducation par la planification et le pilotage stratégique en Haïti, Janvier 2022.
Conny Hoitink et Isabelle de Geuser
Cette évaluation externe, déroulée entièrement en ligne lors de la crise covid, présente l’analyse et l’interprétation des 41 effets du programme mise en oeuvre par l’Institut International de Planification de l’Éducation (IIPE) de l’UNESCO au sein du Ministère de l’Education Nationale et de la Formation Professionnelle de Haïti entre 2018 et 2021. Elle présente des nouvelles pratiques établies au sein du Ministère et répond à la question de la validité du choix du programme de se concentrer sur le niveau décentralisé, dans un contexte excessivement centralisée.
-
CASES IN OUTCOME HARVESTING: TEN PILOT EXPERIENCES IDENTIFY NEW LEARNING FROM MULTI-STAKEHOLDER PROJECTS TO IMPROVE RESULTS
JENNY GOLD AND RICARDO WILSON-GRAU WITH WORLD BANK INSTITUTE PROJECT STAFF, JUNE 2014
Starting in 2012, the World Bank Institute undertook formative pilot evaluations to explore how Outcome Harvesting tools might help project teams and clients to manage knowledge and learn from complex and difficult to monitor development processes. This booklet contains an average of 30 outcomes per pilot:
Leadership for Results: Developing Capacity and Delivering Results toward Public Sector Reform in Burundi
Implementing Reform Initiatives in Solid Waste Management in Bosnia
Improving Governance in Pharmaceutical Procurement and Supply Chain Management in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda
Strengthening Parliamentary Oversight of National Budgets in Africa
Priority Setting and Constitutional Mandates in Health
Improving Open Contracting Processes at the Country and Global Level
Strengthening Capacities of Local Governments in South East Europe
Strengthening Implementation of Legislation on Access to Information across Latin America
Scaling up Capacity Development of City Officials and Practitioners across China Through eLearning
Improving Social Accountability in the Philippines Education Sector
-
EVALUATION OF THE MERCY CORPS BROADENING PARTICIPATION THROUGH CIVIL SOCIETY PROGRAMME IN IRAQ, 2013-2015
RICARDO WILSON-GRAU AND THE TEAM LEADER OF MERCY CORPS-JORDAN AND THE BPCS IRAQ ADVOCACY PROGRAM MANAGER. (Due to Mercy Corps policy, they cannot be named.)
This summative, internal evaluation harvested the 148 most significant changes in behaviours, actions or decisions of Iraqi citizens and government entities for strengthening Iraq’s transition to participatory democracy, to which Mercy Corps-supported civil society organisations or allies contributed. With support of the evaluation team, the BPCS chief of party, Mercy Corps Iraq senior M&E manager and the BPCS senior program director led Mercy Cops staff in an exercise to analyse and interpret the outcomes in the light of the evaluation questions that guided the exercise.
-
OUTCOMES EVALUATION OF THE GLOBAL CHILD PROTECTION IN CRISIS (CPC) NETWORK 2008 – 2011
KORNELIA RASSMANN, RICHARD SMITH, JOHN MAUREMOOTOO (2012)
Summative evaluation using a fusion of Outcome Harvesting and the Network Functions Approach (NFA). Assesses the extent to which 137 outcomes (1) facilitated learning, (2) influenced child protection policy and practice, and (3) enhanced CPC’s standing within the child protection landscape. The participatory process of the evaluation served as a means for knowledge sharing and learning. The evaluation analyzes the network’s contribution to the outcomes with respect to its form and purpose functions (NFA).
-
Reducing the Risk of Radicalisation and Violent Extremism in Lebanese Prisons
Malik Alkhawaja, Chantal Tayya
Search for Common Ground used Outcome Harvesting to evaluate the Reducing the Risk of Radicalisation and Violent Extremism in Lebanese Prisons project. The project was designed to minimise the prospects of violent extremism in Lebanon through a combination of activities that focused on shifting community attitudes and perceptions towards inmates and former inmates.
-
DOING THINGS DIFFERENTLY: RETHINKING MONITORING AND EVALUATION TO UNDERSTAND CHANGE, 2016
MADELINE CHURCH
In 2012-2015, Safer World has put in place a way of monitoring, evaluating and learning from its work focused on behaviour and relationship change. This paper outlines the process Safer World went through to adapt, embed, and embrace an approach inspired by Outcome Mapping and Outcome Harvesting.
-
OUTCOMES EVALUATION OF THE GLOBAL NETWORK OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS FOR DISASTER REDUCTION (GNDR) 2012 – 2015
KORNELIA RASSMANN AND RICHARD SMITH
This summative, participatory evaluation used three notions of outcome: i) 180 “basic perceived outcomes” that were, however, not sufficiently specific to be treated as outcomes as defined in the Outcome Harvesting approach; ii) 21 “SMART Outcomes” that do meet the criteria; and iii) 6 specific outcome themes were selected from the 21 outcomes and developed into extended ‘Outcome Stories’ for triangulation (substantiation) by more independent sources.
-
Outcome harvesting evaluation of 20 years of cooperation between the Danish and Ugandan Disability Movements
Richard Smith, Goele Scheers
The Danish disability movement has been supporting the Uganda disability movement through Danida funding for over 20 years. This Outcome Harvesting Evaluation reflects back on those 20 years of cooperation.
-
Shared resources, joint solutions (2021). Highlights from the outcome harvesting analysis.
Kornelia Rassmann (consultant), Marielouise Slettenhaar-Ket, Sander van Andel (IUCN NL) and Stanley Walet (WWF NL)
-
BIONET 2007‐2010 EVALUATION
RICARDO WILSON-GRAU, GEOFFREY HOWARD, MIKE JEGER
Summative evaluation and assessment of the prospects for the BioNET global “taxonomy for development” network to increase its impact on food security, in particular through greater support to plant health systems. Reports on the experience of identifying and documenting 200 emergent outcomes.